image1 image2 image3

The Millennial Minds|redefining millennials|a blog by BABRC 4-1D

Safeguarding Philippine Education System from Historical Revisionism

It wasn’t surprising when the Supreme Court (SC) allowed the burial of the late dictator and former President Ferdinand Marcos at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. President Rodrigo Duterte has shown his support on the burial during his campaign and during his first days as President, saying Filipinos should put an end to the rage that’s been dividing our country for years now. Refusal of the public was expected, of course, as anti-Marcoses believe the late dictator does not deserve to be there. However, little did we know, the remains of Ferdinand Marcos Sr. has been finally transferred to the Heroes’ Cemetery without the knowledge of the public. And it was just 10 days after the permission was given by the Supreme Court.
It has been a three-decade debate of where to rest the dead body— and it is understandable why people are in different sides regarding this issue. Some still believe that the country was the best under Marcos’ regime and some do not even think that he is fit of whatever qualifications it is to be a ‘hero.’ But regardless which side has the most number of members, we can’t deny that there is more to this exchange of arguments.
We may not admit but this generation is somewhat ‘miseducated.’ Social media is one proof of how misinformed we are by calling each other as “dilawan” when one is anti-Marcos or to pros as “Bobong Marcos apologist.” It’s funny and disappointing at the same. It seems like we really need a review of the history or maybe, our history books.
In the light of giving fairness in every administration in the country, Department of Education (DepEd) Secretary Leonor Briones confirmed that the agency will include the ruling of Supreme Court to the burial of Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr at the Libingan ng mga Bayani. This decision, according to her, would be a part of the administration review to give an unbiased account of the Martial Law history.1
DepEd then clarified that it is not to refute the abuses happened during Martial Law but is more to give an in-depth and comprehensive discussion of this one paramount event in Philippine history. Yet, not only Marcos will revel with DepEd’s assessment. Even before Briones became the official secretary of DepEd, she guaranteed that the review will cover all Presidents’ administration 2 with the aim to give objective analysis to each of them.
Briones also stressed that the intension of this review3 is definitely not to force the students to think Marcos is a hero. Instead, they want to give them the freedom to think critically and make their own judgments based on facts and objective information, heavily based on official historical accounts. This is also to keep balance between the abominations and accomplishments under his government that are usually the subject of arguments about Marcos. Furthermore, these revisions will be implemented in curriculum guides for Grade 5 and 6 Araling Panlipunan4 and will reflect in the new batch of textbooks in public schools under the K to 12 program.
What we hardly need is education that would lessen the ignorance of the youth and ease the pain passed unto us. We, as the inheritor of the results of what happened in the past, must always be aware of the truth. Even if we didn’t witness Martial Law or the regime of Marcos, we should appreciate and give value to the sacrifices. Most especially to the values it can teach us.
We should involve ourselves in these issues so that the mistakes that were taught to us and consciously unlearned will not be passed on to the next or succeeding generations.
We shall not be anyone’s pro other than our country; instead, we shall be pro-Filipino, by mind and by heart.
Above all, we aim to impart a singular truth and maybe that is lacking in our history books— the consistency of truth that we can all agree on.


-By Pearl Rubion




Share this:

CONVERSATION

0 comments:

Post a Comment